[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201009124759.592550-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:47:59 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bristot@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com, echaudro@...hat.com,
atheurer@...hat.com, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 RT] net: openvswitch: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code
The following BUG has been reported (slightly edited):
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: handler106/3082
caller is flow_lookup.isra.15+0x2c/0xf0 [openvswitch]
CPU: 46 PID: 3082 Comm: handler106 Not tainted ... #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06DKY5, BIOS 2.5.4 01/13/2020
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x5c/0x80
check_preemption_disabled+0xc4/0xd0
flow_lookup.isra.15+0x2c/0xf0 [openvswitch]
ovs_flow_tbl_lookup+0x3b/0x60 [openvswitch]
ovs_flow_cmd_new+0x2d8/0x430 [openvswitch]
? __switch_to_asm+0x35/0x70
? __switch_to_asm+0x41/0x70
? __switch_to_asm+0x35/0x70
genl_family_rcv_msg+0x1d7/0x410
? migrate_enable+0x123/0x3a0
genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0x8c
? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xff/0x2e0
? genl_family_rcv_msg+0x410/0x410
netlink_rcv_skb+0x4c/0x120
genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
netlink_unicast+0x197/0x230
netlink_sendmsg+0x204/0x3d0
sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50
___sys_sendmsg+0x29f/0x300
? migrate_enable+0x123/0x3a0
? ep_send_events_proc+0x8a/0x1f0
? ep_scan_ready_list.constprop.23+0x237/0x260
? rt_spin_unlock+0x23/0x40
? ep_poll+0x1b3/0x390
? __fget+0x72/0xa0
__sys_sendmsg+0x57/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x87/0x1a0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
RIP: 0033:0x7f1ed72ccb07
Code: ...
RSP: 002b:00007f1ecbd9ba80 EFLAGS: 00003293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000007b RCX: 00007f1ed72ccb07
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007f1ecbd9bb10 RDI: 000000000000007b
RBP: 00007f1ecbd9bb10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f1ecbd9d390
R10: 0000000019616156 R11: 0000000000003293 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f1ecbd9d338 R14: 00007f1ecbd9bfb0 R15: 00007f1ecbd9bb10
This happens because openvswitch/flow_table::flow_lookup() accesses
per-cpu data while being preemptible (and migratable).
Fix it by adding get/put_cpu_light(), so that, even if preempted, the
task executing this code is not migrated (operation is also guarded by
ovs_mutex mutex).
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
---
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index e2235849a57e..7df27ef7da09 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -732,11 +732,14 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
u32 *n_cache_hit,
u32 *index)
{
- u64 *usage_counters = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr);
+ u64 *usage_counters;
struct sw_flow *flow;
struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
int i;
+ get_cpu_light();
+ usage_counters = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr);
+
if (likely(*index < ma->max)) {
mask = rcu_dereference_ovsl(ma->masks[*index]);
if (mask) {
@@ -746,6 +749,7 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
usage_counters[*index]++;
u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp);
(*n_cache_hit)++;
+ put_cpu_light();
return flow;
}
}
@@ -766,10 +770,12 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp);
usage_counters[*index]++;
u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp);
+ put_cpu_light();
return flow;
}
}
+ put_cpu_light();
return NULL;
}
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists