linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: replace add_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201009120900.GB10588@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:09:00 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
        Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: replace add_memory_region with memblock

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:00:36AM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2020/10/8 23:20, Serge Semin 写道:
> 
> [...]
> >
> >>-		add_memory_region(LOONGSON_HIGHMEM_START,
> >>-				  highmemsize << 20, BOOT_MEM_RAM);
> >>-
> >>-	add_memory_region(LOONGSON_PCI_MEM_END + 1, LOONGSON_HIGHMEM_START -
> >>-			  LOONGSON_PCI_MEM_END - 1, BOOT_MEM_RESERVED);
> >>-
> >>+		memblock_add(LOONGSON_HIGHMEM_START, highmemsize << 20);
> >The same question. Is it ok to discard the
> >[LOONGSON_PCI_MEM_END+1:LOONGSON_HIGHMEM_START-LOONGSON_PCI_MEM_END-1] region
> >removal operation?
> Hi all,
> 
> I can confirm this reservation can be removed.

thank you for confirming.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]