lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1602214325.14806.49.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:32:05 +0800
From:   Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
CC:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        Seiya Wang (王迺君) 
        <seiya.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v5,2/4] dt-binding: mediatek: mt8192: update mtk-wdt document

On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 17:28 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 29/09/2020 05:20, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > update mtk-wdt document for MT8192 platform
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> You added Guenters Reviewed-by in v4 of this series, but I don't see that on 
> Guenter provided this tag. In the future please make sure that you don't add 
> tags to your patches that were not provided. This creates great confusion.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

Hi Guenter,

Should I remove the "Reviewed-by:Guenter" tag, and re-submit this patch
for your review, or keeping the status quo and wait for Wim's comment?

Thanks
Crystal
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt
> > index 45eedc2c3141..e36ba60de829 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties:
> >   	"mediatek,mt7629-wdt", "mediatek,mt6589-wdt": for MT7629
> >   	"mediatek,mt8183-wdt": for MT8183
> >   	"mediatek,mt8516-wdt", "mediatek,mt6589-wdt": for MT8516
> > +	"mediatek,mt8192-wdt": for MT8192
> >   
> >   - reg : Specifies base physical address and size of the registers.
> >   
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ