lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201009175745.GA3489710@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 12:57:45 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Sean V Kelley <seanvk.dev@...gontracks.org>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...el.com,
        qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/14] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR

On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 11:47:32AM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote:
> From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> 
> When attempting error recovery for an RCiEP associated with an RCEC device,
> there needs to be a way to update the Root Error Status, the Uncorrectable
> Error Status and the Uncorrectable Error Severity of the parent RCEC.
> In some non-native cases in which there is no OS visible device
> associated with the RCiEP, there is nothing to act upon as the firmware
> is acting before the OS. So add handling for the linked 'rcec' in AER/ERR
> while taking into account non-native cases.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c |  9 +++++----
>  drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 65dff5f3457a..dccdba60b5d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1358,17 +1358,18 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
>  static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	int aer = dev->aer_cap;
> +	int rc = 0;
>  	u32 reg32;
> -	int rc;
> -
>  
>  	/* Disable Root's interrupt in response to error messages */
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
>  	reg32 &= ~ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
>  	pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>  
> -	rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
> -	pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n");
> +	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) {
> +		rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
> +		pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n");
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Clear Root Error Status */
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, &reg32);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index 38abd7984996..956ad4c86d53 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>  /**
>   * pci_walk_bridge - walk bridges potentially AER affected
>   * @bridge   bridge which may be an RCEC with associated RCiEPs,
> - *           an RCiEP associated with an RCEC, or a Port.
> + *           or a Port.
> + * @dev      an RCiEP lacking an associated RCEC.
>   * @cb       callback to be called for each device found
>   * @userdata arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback.
>   *
> @@ -160,13 +161,20 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>   * If the device provided has no subordinate bus, call the provided
>   * callback on the device itself.
>   */
> -static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev *bridge, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> +static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev *bridge, struct pci_dev *dev,
> +			    int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
>  			    void *userdata)
>  {
> -	if (bridge->subordinate)
> +	/*
> +	 * In a non-native case where there is no OS-visible reporting
> +	 * device the bridge will be NULL, i.e., no RCEC, no PORT.
> +	 */
> +	if (bridge && bridge->subordinate)
>  		pci_walk_bus(bridge->subordinate, cb, userdata);
> -	else
> +	else if (bridge)
>  		cb(bridge, userdata);
> +	else
> +		cb(dev, userdata);
>  }
>  
>  static pci_ers_result_t flr_on_rciep(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -196,16 +204,25 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  	type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
>  	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
>  	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
> -	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC ||
> -	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
> +	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)
>  		bridge = dev;
> +	else if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
> +		bridge = dev->rcec;
>  	else
>  		bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
>  
>  	pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
>  	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
> -		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_frozen_detected, &status);
> +		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_frozen_detected, &status);
>  		if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The callback only clears the Root Error Status
> +			 * of the RCEC (see aer.c). Only perform this for the
> +			 * native case, i.e., an RCEC is present.
> +			 */
> +			if (bridge)
> +				reset_subordinate_devices(bridge);

Help me understand this.  There are lots of callbacks in this picture,
but I guess this "callback only clears Root Error Status" must refer
to aer_root_reset(), i.e., the reset_subordinate_devices pointer?

Of course, the caller of pcie_do_recovery() supplied that pointer.
And we can infer that it must be aer_root_reset(), not
dpc_reset_link(), because RCECs and RCiEPs are not allowed to
implement DPC.

I wish we didn't have either this assumption about what
reset_subordinate_devices points to, or the assumption about what
aer_root_reset() does.  They both seem a little bit tenuous.

We already made aer_root_reset() smart enough to check for RCECs.  Can
we put the FLR there, too?  Then we wouldn't have this weird situation
where reset_subordinate_devices() does a reset and clears error
status, EXCEPT for this case where it only clears error status and we
do the reset here?

>  			status = flr_on_rciep(dev);
>  			if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>  				pci_warn(dev, "function level reset failed\n");
> @@ -219,13 +236,13 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  			}
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_normal_detected, &status);
> +		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_normal_detected, &status);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) {
>  		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>  		pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast mmio_enabled message\n");
> -		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_mmio_enabled, &status);
> +		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_mmio_enabled, &status);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) {
> @@ -236,14 +253,14 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  		 */
>  		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>  		pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast slot_reset message\n");
> -		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_slot_reset, &status);
> +		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_slot_reset, &status);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
>  		goto failed;
>  
>  	pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast resume message\n");
> -	pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_resume, &status);
> +	pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_resume, &status);
>  
>  	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
>  	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ