[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 06:00:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/23] Use asm-generic for mmu_context no-op
functions
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:25:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 4:02 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:01:22 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Are there other changes that depend on this? If not, I would
> > > just wait until -rc1 and then either push the branch correctly or
> > > rebase the patches on that first, to avoid pushing something that
> > > did not see the necessary testing.
> >
> > If it is useful enough (or important enough), then put in in your
> > linux-next included branch, but don't ask Linus to merge it until the
> > second week of the merge window ... no worse than some other stuff I
> > see :-(
>
> By itself, it's a nice cleanup, but it doesn't provide any immediate
> benefit over the previous state, while potentially introducing a
> regression in one of the less tested architectures.
OK.
> The question to me is really whether Nick has any pending work
> that he would like to submit after this branch is merged into
> mainline.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists