[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 22:22:30 +0900
From: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@...e.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
"supporter:QLOGIC QLGE 10Gb ETHERNET DRIVER"
<GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list:QLOGIC QLGE 10Gb ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] staging: qlge: coredump via devlink health
reporter
On 2020-10-10 18:02 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
[...]
> > > + do { \
> > > + err = fill_seg_(fmsg, &dump->seg_hdr, dump->seg_regs); \
> > > + if (err) { \
> > > + kvfree(dump); \
> > > + return err; \
> > > + } \
> > > + } while (0)
> > > +
> > > +static int qlge_reporter_coredump(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
> > > + struct devlink_fmsg *fmsg, void *priv_ctx,
> > > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > > +{
> > > + int err = 0;
> > > +
> > > + struct qlge_devlink *dev = devlink_health_reporter_priv(reporter);
> >
> > Please name this variable ql_devlink, like in qlge_probe().
>
> I happened to find the following text in drivers/staging/qlge/TODO
> > * in terms of namespace, the driver uses either qlge_, ql_ (used by
> > other qlogic drivers, with clashes, ex: ql_sem_spinlock) or nothing (with
> > clashes, ex: struct ob_mac_iocb_req). Rename everything to use the "qlge_"
> > prefix.
This comment applies to global identifiers, not local variables.
>
> So I will adopt qlge_ instead. Besides I prefer qlge_dl to ql_devlink.
Up to you but personally, I think ql_devlink is better. In any case,
"dev" is too general and often used for struct net_device pointers
instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists