[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0E51DAB1-5973-4226-B127-65D77DC46CB5@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:58:34 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
CC: kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/kvm: Add KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID
On 10 October 2020 12:44:10 BST, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 10 2020 at 11:06, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 01:27 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 08 2020 at 22:39, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> For the next submission, can you please
>>>
>>> - pick up the -ENODEV changes for HPET/IOAPIC which I posted
>earlier
>>
>> I think the world will be a nicer place if HPET and IOAPIC have their
>> own struct device and their drivers can just use
>dev_get_msi_domain().
>>
>> The IRQ remapping drivers already plug into the device-add notifier
>and
>> can fill in the appropriate MSI domain just like they do¹ for PCI and
>> ACPI devices.
>>
>> Using platform_add_bundle() for HPET looks trivial enough; I'll have
>a
>> play with that and then do IOAPIC too if/when the initialisation
>order
>> and hotplug handling all works out OK to install the correct
>> msi_domain.
>
>Yes, I was wondering about that when I made PCI at least use that
>mechanism, but had not had time to actually look at it.
Yeah. There's some muttering to be done for HPET about whether it's *its* MSI domain or whether it's the parent domain. But I'll have a play. I think we'll be able to drop the whole irq_remapping_get_irq_domain() thing.
Either way, it's a separate cleanup and the 15-bit APIC ID series I posted yesterday should be fine as it is.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists