linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/14] fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes without iter ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 10 Oct 2020 01:55:24 +0000
From:   Alexander Viro <aviro@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <aviro@...hat.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes without
 iter ops

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:29:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:19 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, that makes more sense.  So the patchset from Matthew
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20201003025534.21045-1-willy@infradead.org/T/#u
> > isn't what you had in mind.
> 
> No.
> 
> That first patch makes sense - it's just the "ppos can be NULL" patch.
> 
> But as mentioned, NULL isn't "shorthand for zero". It's just "pipes
> don't _have_ a pos, trying to pass in some explicit position is
> crazy".
> 
> So no, the other patches in that set are a bit odd, I think.
> 
> SOME of them look potentially fine - the bpfilter one seems to be
> valid, for example, because it's literally about reading/writing a
> pipe. And maybe the sysctl one is similarly sensible - I didn't check
> the context of that one.

FWIW, I hadn't pushed that branch out (or merged it into #for-next yet);
for one thing, uml part (mconsole) is simply broken, for another...
IMO ##5--8 are asking for kernel_pread() and if you look at binfmt_elf.c,
you'll see elf_read() being pretty much that.  acct.c, keys and usermode
parts are asking for kernel_pwrite() as well.

I've got stuck looking through the drivers/target stuff - it would've
been another kernel_pwrite() candidate, but it smells like its use of
filp_open() is really asking for trouble, starting with symlink attacks.
Not sure - I'm not familiar with the area, but...