[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012135845.s6tknsnjrtsuoacf@gilmour.lan>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:58:45 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/14] ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Change set_chan_cfg() params
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 10:22:11PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> As slots and slot_width can be set manually using set_tdm().
> These values are then kept in sun4i_i2s struct.
> So we need to check if these values are set or not.
>
> This is not done actually and will trigger a bug.
> For example, if we set to the simple soundcard in the device-tree
> dai-tdm-slot-width = <32> and then start a stream using S16_LE,
> currently we would calculate BCLK for 32-bit slots, but program
> lrck_period for 16-bit slots, making the sample rate double what we
> expected.
>
> To fix this, we need to check if these values are set or not but as
> this logic is already done by the caller. Avoid duplicating this
> logic and just pass the required values as params to set_chan_cfg().
>
> Suggested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
We still have an ongoing discussion on this one in the v6
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists