[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012095955.0741313b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:59:55 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@...il.com>,
Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Add kthread_work tracepoints
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 11:03:22 -0700
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> /**
> + * sched_kthread_work_execute_start - called immediately before the work callback
> + * @work: pointer to struct kthread_work
> + *
> + * Allows to track kthread work execution.
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_work_execute_start,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct kthread_work *work),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(work),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field( void *, work )
> + __field( void *, function)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->work = work;
> + __entry->function = work->func;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("work struct %p: function %ps", __entry->work, __entry->function)
> +);
> +
> +/**
> + * sched_kthread_work_execute_end - called immediately after the work callback
> + * @work: pointer to struct work_struct
> + * @function: pointer to worker function
> + *
> + * Allows to track workqueue execution.
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_work_execute_end,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct kthread_work *work, kthread_work_func_t function),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(work, function),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field( void *, work )
> + __field( void *, function)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->work = work;
> + __entry->function = function;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("work struct %p: function %ps", __entry->work, __entry->function)
> +);
> +
Please combine the above into:
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_kthread_work_execute_template,
TP_PROTO(struct kthread_work *work),
TP_ARGS(work),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( void *, work )
__field( void *, function)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->work = work;
__entry->function = work->func;
),
TP_printk("work struct %p: function %ps", __entry->work, __entry->function)
);
DEFINE_EVENT(sched_kthread_work_execute_template, sched_kthread_work_execute_start,
TP_PROTO(struct kthread_work *work),
TP_ARGS(work));
DEFINE_EVENT(sched_kthread_work_execute_template, sched_kthread_work_execute_end,
TP_PROTO(struct kthread_work *work),
TP_ARGS(work));
As events are cheap, classes are expensive (size wise), and a TRACE_EVENT()
is really just a CLASS and EVENT for a single instance.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists