[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012104614.25ea97bc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:46:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tracing: support "bool" type in synthetic trace
events
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:26:13 -0500
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Looks ok to me.
>
> Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Great!
I'll pull this patch into my tree. It doesn't look like patch 2/2 is
dependent on this and these two can go through different trees.
Is everyone OK if I take this patch through my tree?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists