| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20201012153850.26996-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:38:24 -0700
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 00/26] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack
Control-flow Enforcement (CET) is a new Intel processor feature that blocks
return/jump-oriented programming attacks. Details are in "Intel 64 and
IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual" [1].
CET can protect applications and the kernel. This series enables only
application-level protection, and has three parts:
- Shadow stack [2],
- Indirect branch tracking [3], and
- Selftests [4].
I have run tests on these patches for quite some time, and they have been
very stable. Linux distributions with CET are available now, and Intel
processors with CET are becoming available. It would be nice if CET
support can be accepted into the kernel. I will be working to address any
issues should they come up.
Changes in v14:
- Update patch #10, add cpu_feature_enabled() to fixup_dirty_*.
- Update patch #19, instead of re-introducing do_mmap_pgoff(), make all
callers of the wrapper pass a zero vm_flags.
- Update patch #26, move checking vm_flags into arch_validate_prot();
check the task's shadow stack status, instead of static_cpu_has().
[1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-64-and-ia-32-
architectures-sdm-combined-volumes-1-2a-2b-2c-2d-3a-3b-3c-3d-and-4
[2] CET Shadow Stack patches v13:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200925145649.5438-2-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com/
[3] Indirect Branch Tracking patches v13.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200925145804.5821-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com/
[4] I am holding off the selftests changes and working to get Acked-by's.
The earlier version of the selftests patches:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200521211720.20236-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com/
[5] The kernel ptrace patch is tested with an Intel-internal updated GDB.
I am holding off the kernel ptrace patch to re-test it with my earlier
patch for fixing regset holes.
Yu-cheng Yu (26):
Documentation/x86: Add CET description
x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow
Enforcement Technology (CET)
x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR XSAVES supervisor states
x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler
x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Shadow Stack
x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW
x86/mm: Remove _PAGE_DIRTY_HW from kernel RO pages
x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW
drm/i915/gvt: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS
x86/mm: Update pte_modify for _PAGE_COW
x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and pmdp_set_wrprotect() for
transition from _PAGE_DIRTY_HW to _PAGE_COW
mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory
x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking
x86/mm: Update maybe_mkwrite() for shadow stack
mm: Fixup places that call pte_mkwrite() directly
mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack.
mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting
mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for shadow stack
mm: Re-introduce vm_flags to do_mmap()
x86/cet/shstk: User-mode shadow stack support
x86/cet/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack
binfmt_elf: Define GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND properties
ELF: Introduce arch_setup_elf_property()
x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack
x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack
mm: Introduce PROT_SHSTK for shadow stack
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +
Documentation/x86/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst | 133 +++++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 5 +
arch/x86/Kconfig | 39 ++
arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c | 17 +
arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h | 42 +++
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +
arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 8 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h | 13 +
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 10 +
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h | 23 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h | 5 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h | 4 +
arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h | 83 +++++
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 3 +
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 20 +
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 209 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h | 58 ++-
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 15 +
arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h | 32 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 2 +
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 28 +-
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h | 4 +
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/processor-flags.h | 2 +
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 9 +
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
arch/x86/kernel/cet.c | 343 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c | 68 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 28 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 2 +
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 100 +++++
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 28 +-
arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 4 +
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 14 +-
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 32 ++
arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 10 +
arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 59 +++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 19 +
arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +
arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 25 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 2 +-
fs/aio.c | 2 +-
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 4 +
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 3 +
include/linux/elf.h | 6 +
include/linux/mm.h | 38 +-
include/linux/pgtable.h | 35 ++
include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 3 +-
include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 9 +
ipc/shm.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 8 +-
mm/huge_memory.c | 10 +-
mm/memory.c | 5 +-
mm/migrate.c | 3 +-
mm/mmap.c | 23 +-
mm/mprotect.c | 2 +-
mm/nommu.c | 4 +-
mm/util.c | 2 +-
scripts/as-x86_64-has-shadow-stack.sh | 4 +
tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +
.../arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 8 +-
tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 20 +
tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h | 4 +
68 files changed, 1624 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst
create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mman.h
create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cet.c
create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c
create mode 100755 scripts/as-x86_64-has-shadow-stack.sh
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists