[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012163724.jozj3t3kjxty2pb2@beryllium.lan>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:37:24 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Arun Easi <aeasi@...vell.com>
Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qla2xxx: Return EBUSY on fcport deletion
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:07:15AM -0700, Arun Easi wrote:
> This does not appear to be cut against the latest for-next/staging; "rval"
> is not used there for the initial set of returns.
Indeed, forgot to use staging. It's against queue. Let me update it.
> Anyway, returning EBUSY is the right way to go.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists