linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v4] checkpatch: Check for .byte-spelled insn opcodes documentation on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201012175545.GJ22829@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:55:45 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] checkpatch: Check for .byte-spelled insn opcodes
 documentation on x86

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:40:07AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Why?  I think it unnecessary.

Joe, I'm sick'n'tired of debating with you what needs to happen.

Please forget that patch altogether - I'll add the functionality to our
own checker script where I don't need to debate with you what I have to
and I have not to do.

And I won't be getting private emails about you teaching me how I should
have replied to your mail. The only "mistake" I made is even thinking
about adding this to checkpatch. Won't happen again.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette