[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010122022250.17866@felia>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:25:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-safety@...ts.elisa.tech,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-sched: add comment about
find_tt() not returning error
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > And for the static analysis finding, we need to find a way to ignore this
> > finding without simply ignoring all findings or new findings that just
> > look very similar to the original finding, but which are valid.
>
> Then I suggest you fix the tool that "flagged" this, surely this is not
> the only thing it detected with a test like this, right?
>
> What tool reported this?
>
Sudip and I are following on clang analyzer findings.
On linux-next, there is new build target 'make clang-analyzer' that
outputs a bunch of warnings, just as you would expect from such static
analysis tools.
We will fix the tool if we can.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists