lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiwBYoAKQ6H=n0ppZfMe6nVDwDw6cruv7jxZZw4XEmUsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:10:10 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
Cc:     x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/platform updates for v5.10

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:10 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
>
> please pull the x86/platform queue.

Hmm. I didn't immediately notice this new warning, because it only
happens with the clang build that I don't do in between every pull.

But this pull causes new warnings from clang:

arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c:250:23: warning: implicit conversion
from 'unsigned long' to 'int' changes value from 1152921504606846976
to 0 [-Wconstant-conversion]
                uvh_nmi_mmrx_mask = UVH_EVENT_OCCURRED0_EXTIO_INT0_MASK;
                                  ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

and I think that warning is correct, and the code is wrong.

In particular, we have

     static int uvh_nmi_mmrx_mask;

so it's a signed 32-bit integer, and the code is treating it like it's
a 64-bit mask.

Of course, it also looks like that 'uvh_nmi_mmrx_mask' thing is a
write-only variable so it doesn't matter, but can we _please_ get this
code fixed ASAP?

                     Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ