[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29cb75c8cb92d34e3dd8ea156893760c81d935b4.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:59:23 -0500
From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: axelrasmussen@...gle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] tracing: Add synthetic event error logging
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 17:49 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:42:40 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:18:06 -0500
> > Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +static char last_cmd[MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL];
> > > +
> > > +static int errpos(const char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + return err_pos(last_cmd, str);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void last_cmd_set(char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!str)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + strncat(last_cmd, str, MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL - 1);
> >
> > If I understand strncat() correctly, it will add 'n' + 1 bytes from
> > str
> > to last_cmd. That is, I think you want:
> >
> > strncat(last_cmd, str, MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL - (strlen(last_cmd) +
> > 1));
> >
>
> Looking at the patch more, it only has one caller to last_cmd_set(),
> and one caller to synth_err_clear().
>
> Why not just clear on set?
Yeah, that would make sense, or just remove the clear and use strncpy
in last_cmd_set() instead.
Tom
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void synth_err(u8 err_type, u8 err_pos)
> > > +{
> > > + tracing_log_err(NULL, "synthetic_events", last_cmd, err_text,
> > > + err_type, err_pos);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void synth_err_clear(void)
> > > +{
> > > + last_cmd[0] = '\0';
> > > +}
> > > +
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists