linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/pti] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING 767d46ab566dd489733666efe48732d523c8c332

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c06bc69c-e3f6-2902-5df7-15cf2c9ea9d7@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:16:54 +0800
From:   Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING
 767d46ab566dd489733666efe48732d523c8c332

Hi Boris,

On 9/17/20 9:37 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:00:44AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:36:20PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
>>> The 2nd type is this one, which is a summarized report of head
>>> to provide an overview. Most of time, repo owner can receive the
>>> bisected mail. For this time, the issue is reported against peterz-queue
>>> repo which has this 767d46ab56 head firstly. Since the head later appears
>>> in tip, we just gather all issues and send the summary to tip related
>>> recipients. But no more bisected mail.
>> Yeah, but that second report is not very helpful because nowhere it says
>> it is a summary and nowhere it has that link you pasted above so that
>> some other maintainer can go look.
>>
>> Always put yourself in the recipient's shoes and ask yourself: "what can
>> the recipient do with this report and does it have everything in there
>> required to be able to reproduce the issue?"
>>
>> If not, then it needs changing.
> thanks for the advice. We will provide update in 1-2 weeks for the progress
> to make the report more informative and useful.

We have added the reported links in the report, you can find it in the 
latest tip report:

[tip:master] BUILD REGRESSION 820e6f502f021417140bc8ee11f9c7be148ea844

tree/branch:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git   master
branch HEAD: 820e6f502f021417140bc8ee11f9c7be148ea844  Merge branch 'efi/core'

Error/Warning reports:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202010112007.JDl1BSci-lkp@intel.com

Error/Warning in current branch:

tools/include/linux/types.h:30:18: error: typedef redefinition with different types ('uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long') vs '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'))
tools/include/linux/types.h:31:17: error: typedef redefinition with different types ('int64_t' (aka 'long') vs '__s64' (aka 'long long'))

Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs:

clang_recent_errors
`-- x86_64-randconfig-a016-20201011
     |-- tools-include-linux-types.h:error:typedef-redefinition-with-different-types-(-int64_t-(aka-long-)-vs-__s64-(aka-long-long-))
     `-- tools-include-linux-types.h:error:typedef-redefinition-with-different-types-(-uint64_t-(aka-unsigned-long-)-vs-__u64-(aka-unsigned-long-long-))

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

>
>>> We will consider how to show useful produce info in summary report as
>>> the feedback here, which is quite useful, such like pointing to the
>>> bisected mail. This would take some time, and we will add to our TODO
>>> as high priority.
>> Yes, that would be much appreciated. You can also tag your reports with
>> a unique hash which is then in an URL so that one can go and download the
>> .config and what else is needed. For example...
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards/Gruss,
>>      Boris.
>>
>> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette