linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] kunit: tool: Mark 'kunittest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201012102621.32226-2-sjpark@amazon.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:26:21 +0200
From:   SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
To:     <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
CC:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>, <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: tool: Mark 'kunittest_config' as constant again

From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>

'kunit_kernel.kunittest_config' was constant at first, and therefore it
used UPPER_SNAKE_CASE naming convention that usually means it is
constant in Python world.  But, commit e3212513a8f0 ("kunit: Create
default config in '--build_dir'") made it modifiable to fix a use case
of the tool and thus the naming also changed to lower_snake_case.
However, this resulted in a confusion.  As a result, some successing
changes made the tool unittest fail, and a fix[1] of it again incurred
the '--build_dir' use case failure.

As the previous commit fixed the '--build_dir' use case without
modifying the variable again, this commit marks the variable as constant
again with UPPER_SNAKE_CASE, to reduce future confusions.

[1] Commit d43c7fb05765 ("kunit: tool: fix improper treatment of file location")

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py        | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index 611c23e178f8..0a58c1fb87d9 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ class KunitStatus(Enum):
 	TEST_FAILURE = auto()
 
 def create_default_kunitconfig():
-	if not os.path.exists(kunit_kernel.kunitconfig_path):
+	if not os.path.exists(kunit_kernel.KUNITCONFIG_PATH):
 		shutil.copyfile('arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig',
-				kunit_kernel.kunitconfig_path)
+				kunit_kernel.KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
 
 def get_kernel_root_path():
 	parts = sys.argv[0] if not __file__ else __file__
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
index 16a997504317..42dca0163479 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ import kunit_config
 import kunit_parser
 
 KCONFIG_PATH = '.config'
-kunitconfig_path = '.kunitconfig'
+KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig'
 BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config'
 
 class ConfigError(Exception):
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
 
 	def __init__(self, build_dir):
 		self._kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
-		self._kconfig.read_from_file(os.path.join(build_dir, kunitconfig_path))
+		self._kconfig.read_from_file(os.path.join(build_dir, KUNITCONFIG_PATH))
 		self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperations()
 		signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.signal_handler)
 
-- 
2.17.1