linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: mention assumption that wbinvd is not needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:32:05 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: mention assumption that wbinvd is not needed

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:14 PM Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,11 @@
> > >   * All CPUs have same idle states as boot CPU
> > >   *
> > >   * Chipset BM_STS (bus master status) bit is a NOP
> > > - *     for preventing entry into deep C-stats
> > > + *     for preventing entry into deep C-states
> > > + *
> > > + * CPU will flush caches as needed when entering a C-state via MWAIT
> >
> > I would rephrase this to mention that the above actually is an assumption.
>
> This comment block is by itself a list of assumptions.

Ah, OK

> It begins with heading
> "Design Assumptions" and then lists two assumptions. This patch adds a third
> one.
>
> With that clarified, do you still need me to change this hunk?

No need.