[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jzebmUJ8zYzCU1W08POdE7=+Uu5DGGjJaZLsp06+=YAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:32:05 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: mention assumption that wbinvd is not needed
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:14 PM Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,11 @@
> > > * All CPUs have same idle states as boot CPU
> > > *
> > > * Chipset BM_STS (bus master status) bit is a NOP
> > > - * for preventing entry into deep C-stats
> > > + * for preventing entry into deep C-states
> > > + *
> > > + * CPU will flush caches as needed when entering a C-state via MWAIT
> >
> > I would rephrase this to mention that the above actually is an assumption.
>
> This comment block is by itself a list of assumptions.
Ah, OK
> It begins with heading
> "Design Assumptions" and then lists two assumptions. This patch adds a third
> one.
>
> With that clarified, do you still need me to change this hunk?
No need.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists