[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201012132630.764037085@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Dumitru Ceara <dceara@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 28/49] openvswitch: handle DNAT tuple collision
From: Dumitru Ceara <dceara@...hat.com>
commit 8aa7b526dc0b5dbf40c1b834d76a667ad672a410 upstream.
With multiple DNAT rules it's possible that after destination
translation the resulting tuples collide.
For example, two openvswitch flows:
nw_dst=10.0.0.10,tp_dst=10, actions=ct(commit,table=2,nat(dst=20.0.0.1:20))
nw_dst=10.0.0.20,tp_dst=10, actions=ct(commit,table=2,nat(dst=20.0.0.1:20))
Assuming two TCP clients initiating the following connections:
10.0.0.10:5000->10.0.0.10:10
10.0.0.10:5000->10.0.0.20:10
Both tuples would translate to 10.0.0.10:5000->20.0.0.1:20 causing
nf_conntrack_confirm() to fail because of tuple collision.
Netfilter handles this case by allocating a null binding for SNAT at
egress by default. Perform the same operation in openvswitch for DNAT
if no explicit SNAT is requested by the user and allocate a null binding
for SNAT for packets in the "original" direction.
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1877128
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Fixes: 05752523e565 ("openvswitch: Interface with NAT.")
Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dceara@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -899,15 +899,19 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat(struct net *net, s
}
err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range, maniptype);
- if (err == NF_ACCEPT &&
- ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
- if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
- maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
- else
- maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
+ if (err == NF_ACCEPT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
+ if (ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
+ if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
+ maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
+ else
+ maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
- err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range,
- maniptype);
+ err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range,
+ maniptype);
+ } else if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
+ err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, NULL,
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
+ }
}
/* Mark NAT done if successful and update the flow key. */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists