linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 48/85] iommu/vt-d: Fix lockdep splat in iommu_flush_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201012132635.176466904@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 48/85] iommu/vt-d: Fix lockdep splat in iommu_flush_dev_iotlb()

From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 1a3f2fd7fc4e8f24510830e265de2ffb8e3300d2 ]

Lock(&iommu->lock) without disabling irq causes lockdep warnings.

[   12.703950] ========================================================
[   12.703962] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
[   12.703975] 5.9.0-rc6+ #659 Not tainted
[   12.703983] --------------------------------------------------------
[   12.703995] systemd-udevd/284 just changed the state of lock:
[   12.704007] ffffffffbd6ff4d8 (device_domain_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at:
               iommu_flush_dev_iotlb.part.57+0x2e/0x90
[   12.704031] but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
[   12.704043]  (&iommu->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
[   12.704045]

               and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between
               them.

[   12.704073]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[   12.704085]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[   12.704097]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   12.704106]        ----                    ----
[   12.704115]   lock(&iommu->lock);
[   12.704123]                                local_irq_disable();
[   12.704134]                                lock(device_domain_lock);
[   12.704146]                                lock(&iommu->lock);
[   12.704158]   <Interrupt>
[   12.704164]     lock(device_domain_lock);
[   12.704174]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200927062428.13713-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index 2ffec65df3889..1147626f0d253 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -2560,14 +2560,14 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_one_dev_info(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 		}
 
 		/* Setup the PASID entry for requests without PASID: */
-		spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, flags);
 		if (hw_pass_through && domain_type_is_si(domain))
 			ret = intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(iommu, domain,
 					dev, PASID_RID2PASID);
 		else
 			ret = intel_pasid_setup_second_level(iommu, domain,
 					dev, PASID_RID2PASID);
-		spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(dev, "Setup RID2PASID failed\n");
 			dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
-- 
2.25.1