[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875z7dd70p.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 01:45:58 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kernel: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
On Fri, Oct 09 2020 at 09:13, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hmm. I just noticed that only x86 uses arch_do_signal(), so perhaps you can
>> add this change to this patch right now? Up to you.
>
> Sure, we can do that. Incremental on top then looks like the below. I don't
> feel that strongly about it, but it is nice to avoid re-testing the
> flags.
Yes it makes sense. Can you please make the signature change of
arch_do_signal() in a preparatory patch and only make use of it when you
add the TIF bit to x86?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists