[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtUgX2JNVHW8F4cJ7rY2T-8DNkouQh8O0-j6CAfd4+TCew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:52:28 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, gustavoars@...nel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, dave@...olabs.net,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, chenqiwu@...omi.com,
christophe.leroy@....fr, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] mm: proc: add Sock to /proc/meminfo
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 6:12 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:53 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
> > We are not complaining about TCP using too much memory, but how do
> > we know that TCP uses a lot of memory. When I firstly face this problem,
> > I do not know who uses the 25GB memory and it is not shown in the /proc/meminfo.
> > If we can know the amount memory of the socket buffer via /proc/meminfo, we
> > may not need to spend a lot of time troubleshooting this problem. Not everyone
> > knows that a lot of memory may be used here. But I believe many people
> > should know /proc/meminfo to confirm memory users.
>
> Well, I'd bet networking people know `ss -m` better than /proc/meminfo,
I agree with you. But if someone(not networking people) faces the same
problem. He may suspect that there is a memory leak or think that a certain
driver allocates memory but has no statistics. He only saw the memory
disappeared via /proc/meminfo.
> generally speaking.
>
> The practice here is that if you want some networking-specific counters,
> add it to where networking people know better, that is, `ss -m` or /proc/net/...
>
> Or maybe the problem you described is not specific to networking at all,
> there must be some other places where pages are allocated but not charged.
Yeah, it is not charged. The allocation path is as follows. This allocation
consumes 25GB memory on our server. And it belongs to the network core.
Thanks.
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x11d/0x290
skb_page_frag_refill+0x68/0xf0
sk_page_frag_refill+0x19/0x70
tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x2f4/0xd10
tcp_sendmsg+0x29/0xa0
sock_sendmsg+0x30/0x40
sock_write_iter+0x8f/0x100
__vfs_write+0x10b/0x190
vfs_write+0xb0/0x190
ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> If so, adding a general mm counter in /proc/meminfo makes sense, but
> it won't be specific to networking.
>
> Thanks.
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists