lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:58:47 +0530 From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@...il.com>, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, Markus Wamser <Markus.Wamser@...ed-mode.de>, Luke Hinds <lhinds@...hat.com>, "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TEE based Trusted Keys On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 07:52, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:37:48PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > Add MAINTAINERS entry for TEE based Trusted Keys framework. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> > > Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 48aff80..eb3d889 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -9663,6 +9663,14 @@ F: include/keys/trusted-type.h > > F: include/keys/trusted_tpm.h > > F: security/keys/trusted-keys/ > > > > +KEYS-TRUSTED-TEE > > +M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> > > +L: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org > > +L: keyrings@...r.kernel.org > > +S: Supported > > +F: include/keys/trusted_tee.h > > +F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c > > + > > KEYS/KEYRINGS > > M: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> > > M: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > I'm sorry but I think I have changed my mind on this. This has been > spinning for a while and sometimes conclusions change over the time. > > I don't think that we really need a separate subsystem tag. I don't see it as a separate subsystem but rather a kind of underlying trust source (TEE) driver plugged into existing trusted keys subsystem. We could relate it to the RNG subsystem as well where there is a subsystem maintainer and specific driver maintainers. IMO, having a dedicated entry like this brings clarity in maintenance and in future we may have more trust sources like this added where everyone may not have access to all the trust sources to test. > I'd be for a > new M-entry or R-entry to the existing subsystem tag. It's essential to > have ack from someone with ARM and TEE knowledge but this way too heavy > for the purpose. If you still think otherwise then I am fine with a new M-entry for existing trusted keys subsystem as well. > > I also see it the most manageable if the trusted keys PR's come from a > single source. I echo here with you to have a single source for trusted keys PR's irrespective of whether we go with a separate trust source entry or update existing subsystem entry. -Sumit > > /Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists