linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for RPi firmware PWM bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:08:23 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     f.fainelli@...il.com, linux@...ck-us.net, jdelvare@...e.com,
        wahrenst@....net, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for RPi firmware PWM
 bus

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:35:38PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Hi Uwe, thanks for having a look at this.
> 
> On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 09:01 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > The PWM bus controlling the fan in RPi's official PoE hat can only be
> > > controlled by the board's co-processor.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > > ---
> > >  .../arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../pwm/raspberrypi,firmware-pwm.h            | 13 ++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,firmware-pwm.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml
> > > index a2c63c8b1d10..dcaf00e8602e 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ properties:
> > >        - compatible
> > >        - "#reset-cells"
> > >  
> > > +  pwm:
> > > +    type: object
> > > +
> > > +    properties:
> > > +      compatible:
> > > +        const: raspberrypi,firmware-pwm
> > > +
> > > +      "#pwm-cells":
> > > +        const: 1
> > > +        description: >
> > > +          The argument is the PWM bus number.
> > 
> > This is wrong. #pwm-cells specifies the number of "arguments" for
> > phandles pointing to this node. And I would prefer this being 2 to match
> > the stuff described in the generic pwm binding.
> 
> I saw buses out there with the same limitation as this one (unable to change
> frequency) that used a single cell, so I whent with it. That said I'll be happy
> to change it and drop the custom *_xlate() function in benefit of the default
> one.

As the first cell after the phandle is for the period and only the
second if for flags, this is a poor argument. So yes, use #pwm-cells =
<2> and drop the custom xlate() function please.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)