linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/platform updates for v5.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25632026-b498-022c-f37e-444672d57ecb@hpe.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 05:33:37 -0700
From:   Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/platform updates for v5.10



On 10/13/2020 4:11 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:58:07PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> I was in the process of tracing it through and perhaps it does need a bit
>> more analysis to be correct.  What does it mean to send a patch to fix the
>> compile error, just remove it?
> 
> Yes, to remove it for now as it is unused currently. But making it an
> unsigned long is ok too AFAICT. So should I queue it and send it to
> Linus later?
> 

I'm working on the correct code now, and I have UV4 & UV4A machine time 
starting at 7am (PDT) to test it.  The UV5 simulator does not yet 
emulate console initiated NMI from the BMC.