linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] docs: lockdep-design: fix some warning issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:52:06 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] docs: lockdep-design: fix some warning issues

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:14:31PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> +   =====  ===================================================
> +   ``.``  acquired while irqs disabled and not in irq context
> +   ``-``  acquired in irq context
> +   ``+``  acquired with irqs enabled
> +   ``?``  acquired in irq context with irqs enabled.
> +   =====  ===================================================
>  
>  The bits are illustrated with an example::
>  
> @@ -96,14 +99,14 @@ exact case is for the lock as of the reporting time.
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
>    |              | irq enabled | irq disabled |
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
> -  | ever in irq  |      ?      |       -      |
> +  | ever in irq  |    ``?``    |     ``-``    |
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
> -  | never in irq |      +      |       .      |
> +  | never in irq |    ``+``    |     ``.``    |
>    +--------------+-------------+--------------+
>  
> -The character '-' suggests irq is disabled because if otherwise the
> -charactor '?' would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
> -applied for '+' too.
> +The character ``-`` suggests irq is disabled because if otherwise the
> +charactor ``?`` would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
> +applied for ``+`` too.
>  

NAK!