| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <157d1edf-feec-33b5-7ad5-94f99316ca6e@lechnology.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 21:15:00 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org
Cc: kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com, gwendal@...omium.org,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, syednwaris@...il.com,
patrick.havelange@...ensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@...com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] counter: Internalize sysfs interface code
On 9/26/20 9:18 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> This is a reimplementation of the Generic Counter driver interface.
I'll follow up if I find any problems while testing but here are some
comments I had from looking over the patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-core.c b/drivers/counter/counter-core.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..987c6e8277eb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-core.c
> +/**
> + * counter_register - register Counter to the system
> + * @counter: pointer to Counter to register
> + *
> + * This function registers a Counter to the system. A sysfs "counter" directory
> + * will be created and populated with sysfs attributes correlating with the
> + * Counter Signals, Synapses, and Counts respectively.
> + */
> +int counter_register(struct counter_device *const counter)
> +{
> + struct device *const dev = &counter->dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* Acquire unique ID */
> + counter->id = ida_simple_get(&counter_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (counter->id < 0)
> + return counter->id;
> +
> + /* Configure device structure for Counter */
> + dev->type = &counter_device_type;
> + dev->bus = &counter_bus_type;
> + if (counter->parent) {
> + dev->parent = counter->parent;
> + dev->of_node = counter->parent->of_node;
> + }
> + dev_set_name(dev, "counter%d", counter->id);
> + device_initialize(dev);> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, counter);
> +
> + /* Add Counter sysfs attributes */
> + err = counter_sysfs_add(counter);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_free_id;
> +
> + /* Add device to system */
> + err = device_add(dev);
> + if (err) {
> + put_device(dev);
> + goto err_free_id;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_id:
> + /* get_device/put_device combo used to free managed resources */
> + get_device(dev);
> + put_device(dev);
I've never seen this in a driver before, so it makes me think this is
not the "right way" to do this. After device_initialize() is called, we
already should have a reference to dev, so only device_put() is needed.
> + ida_simple_remove(&counter_ida, counter->id);
In the case of error after device_initialize() is called, won't this
result in ida_simple_remove() being called twice, once here and once in
the release callback?
> + return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(counter_register);
> +
> +/**
> + * counter_unregister - unregister Counter from the system
> + * @counter: pointer to Counter to unregister
> + *
> + * The Counter is unregistered from the system; all allocated memory is freed.
> + */
> +void counter_unregister(struct counter_device *const counter)
> +{
> + if (!counter)
> + return;
> +
> + device_unregister(&counter->dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(counter_unregister);
> +
> +static void devm_counter_unreg(struct device *dev, void *res)
To be consistent, it would be nice to spell out unregister.
> +{
> + counter_unregister(*(struct counter_device **)res);
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c b/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e66ed99dd5ea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> +/**
> + * counter_sysfs_add - Adds Counter sysfs attributes to the device structure
> + * @counter: Pointer to the Counter device structure
> + *
> + * Counter sysfs attributes are created and added to the respective device
> + * structure for later registration to the system. Resource-managed memory
> + * allocation is performed by this function, and this memory should be freed
> + * when no longer needed (automatically by a device_unregister call, or
> + * manually by a devres_release_all call).
> + */
> +int counter_sysfs_add(struct counter_device *const counter)
> +{
> + struct device *const dev = &counter->dev;
> + const size_t num_groups = counter->num_signals + counter->num_counts +
> + 1;
It is OK to go past 80 columns, especially for just for a few characters.
> + struct counter_attribute_group *groups;
> + size_t i, j;
> + int err;
> + struct attribute_group *group;
> + struct counter_attribute *p;
> +
> + /* Allocate space for attribute groups (signals, counts, and ext) */
> + groups = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_groups, sizeof(*groups), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!groups)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Initialize attribute lists */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_groups; i++)
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&groups[i].attr_list);
> +
> + /* Register Counter device attributes */
> + err = counter_device_register(counter, groups);
This function name is a bit misleading. At first I though we were registering
a new counter device (struct device). Maybe counter_sysfs_create_attrs()
would be a better name? (I wouldn't mind having all functions in this
file having a "counter_sysfs_" prefix for that matter.)
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> index 1ff07faef27f..938085dead80 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> @@ -406,7 +414,7 @@ static int ti_eqep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> priv->counter.name = dev_name(dev);
> priv->counter.parent = dev;
> - priv->counter.ops = &ti_eqep_counter_ops;
> + priv->counter.parent = &ti_eqep_counter_ops;
> priv->counter.counts = ti_eqep_counts;
> priv->counter.num_counts = ARRAY_SIZE(ti_eqep_counts);
> priv->counter.signals = ti_eqep_signals;
This looks like an unintentional change and causes a compile error.
> diff --git a/include/linux/counter.h b/include/linux/counter.h
> index 9dbd5df4cd34..132bfecca5c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/counter.h
> @@ -6,417 +6,195 @@
> #ifndef _COUNTER_H_
> #define _COUNTER_H_
>
> -#include <linux/counter_enum.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
struct list_head is defined in linux/types.h. Is there something else
we are using from linux/list.h in this file?
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
It would be helpful to have kernel doc comments on everything in this file.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists