[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2010132110060.866917@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:16:10 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add set_memory_node()
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Jinyang He wrote:
> Commit e7ae8d174eec ("MIPS: replace add_memory_region with memblock")
> replaced add_memory_region(, , BOOT_MEM_RAM) with memblock_add(). But
> it doesn't work well on some platforms which have NUMA like Loongson64.
Please note this is not a full review, I haven't investigated the fitness
for purpose of this change and instead just addressed one aspect of coding
style.
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h
> index aa03b12..29e2d9c 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ extern unsigned long mips_machtype;
>
> extern void detect_memory_region(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t sz_min, phys_addr_t sz_max);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +extern void set_memory_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size);
> +#endif
> +
If anything this needs to be:
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern void set_memory_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size);
#else
static inline void set_memory_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size) {}
#endif
so as to avoid #ifdef clutter across call places.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists