linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201014195948.GE2974@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:59:48 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: add test_min_heap test conversion to KUnit

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:16:10AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:

> There were some issues in the original patch, they should be easy to
> fix. I'm more concerned that Peter's issues are addressed about the
> general direction of the patch, verbosity and testing frameworks. I
> see Vitor followed up with Peter but I'm not sure that means the
> approach has been accepted.

I kinda lost track, as long as it doesn't get more verbose I suppose I'm
fine.