linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:25:26 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree

Hi Kees,

On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 19:44:52 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 09:00:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Kees,
> > 
> > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 01:27:01 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:  
> > >
> > > I assume CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS is enabled for your build (it should be for  
> > 
> > yes, indeed.
> >   
> > > allmodconfig). Does this patch fix it? (I'm kind of blindly guessing
> > > based on my understanding of where this could be coming from...)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > index e1843976754a..22f14956214a 100644
> > > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
> > >  #define KERNEL_CTORS()	. = ALIGN(8);			   \
> > >  			__ctors_start = .;		   \
> > > +			KEEP(*(SORT(.ctors.*)))		   \
> > >  			KEEP(*(.ctors))			   \
> > >  			KEEP(*(SORT(.init_array.*)))	   \
> > >  			KEEP(*(.init_array))		   \  
> > 
> > And that makes the messages go away.  
> 
> Okay then! Thanks for testing. :) I'm not sure why the ppc-hosted
> compiler generates those. Regardless, I'll send a proper patch...

I get these warnings from Linus' tree now ...
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped