[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201014073048.36219-1-dwagner@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:30:48 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>, Arun Easi <aeasi@...vell.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4] qla2xxx: Return EBUSY on fcport deletion
When the fcport is about to be deleted we should return EBUSY instead
of ENODEV. Only for EBUSY the request will be requeued in a multipath
setup.
Also when the firmware has not yet started return EBUSY to avoid
dropping the request.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Arun Easi <aeasi@...vell.com>
---
v4: updated commit message as suggested by Finn
v3: simplify and changed test logic as suggested by Arun
v2: rebased on mkp/staging
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
index 2cd9bd288910..1fa457a5736e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
@@ -555,10 +555,12 @@ static int qla_nvme_post_cmd(struct nvme_fc_local_port *lport,
fcport = qla_rport->fcport;
- if (!qpair || !fcport || (qpair && !qpair->fw_started) ||
- (fcport && fcport->deleted))
+ if (!qpair || !fcport)
return -ENODEV;
+ if (!qpair->fw_started || fcport->deleted)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
vha = fcport->vha;
if (!(fcport->nvme_flag & NVME_FLAG_REGISTERED))
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists