[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201014083419.GB3034607@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:34:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
pavel@...x.de, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/49] 4.19.151-rc1 review
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 09:40:32AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:26:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.151 release.
> > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:26:14 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 155 pass: 153 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
> i386:tools/perf
> x86_64:tools/perf
I tried to fix up the perf build issues, and am just going to give up,
it's not a trivial backport at all, and it looks like no one seems to
care :(
So you might want to take these two builds out of your testing
framework for the moment.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists