linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] of/address: Introduce of_dma_lower_bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:52:49 +0200
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] of/address: Introduce of_dma_lower_bus_limit()

Hi Rob,

On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 10:25 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:12 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> wrote:
> > The function provides the CPU physical address addressable by the most
> > constrained bus in the system. It might be useful in order to
> > dynamically set up memory zones during boot.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/of/address.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/of.h   |  7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> > index eb9ab4f1e80b..755e97b65096 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> > @@ -1024,6 +1024,40 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, const struct bus_dma_region **map)
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_DMA */
> > 
> > +/**
> > + * of_dma_safe_phys_limit - Get system wide DMA safe address space
> > + *
> > + * Gets the CPU physical address limit for safe DMA addressing system wide by
> > + * searching for the most constraining dma-range. Otherwise it returns ~0ULL.
> > + */
> > +u64 __init of_dma_safe_phys_limit(void)
> > +{
> > +       struct device_node *np = NULL;
> > +       struct of_range_parser parser;
> > +       const __be32 *ranges = NULL;
> > +       u64 phys_dma_limit = ~0ULL;
> > +       struct of_range range;
> > +       int len;
> > +
> > +       for_each_of_allnodes(np) {
> > +               dma_addr_t cpu_end = 0;
> > +
> > +               ranges = of_get_property(np, "dma-ranges", &len);
> > +               if (!ranges || !len)
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               of_dma_range_parser_init(&parser, np);
> > +               for_each_of_range(&parser, &range)
> > +                       if (range.cpu_addr + range.size > cpu_end)
> > +                               cpu_end = range.cpu_addr + range.size;
> 
> This doesn't work if you have more than one level of dma-ranges. The
> address has to be translated first. It should be okay to do that on
> the start or end address (if not, your DT is broken).

for_each_of_range() calls of_pci_range_parser_one() which utimately populates
range.cpu_addr with of_translate_dma_address() results. Isn't that good enough?

> Please add/extend a unittest for this.

Will do.

Regards,
Nicolas


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)