lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a3e1b00-df93-8c81-6ecb-355bd7693ab6@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:52:42 +0800
From:   "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>,
        linux-leds <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        "Enric Balletbo i Serra" <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: google,cros-ec: explicitly allow
 additional properties



On 2020/10/14 1:53, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Zhen
> 
> On 10/13/20 11:08 AM, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> There are so many properties have not been described in this yaml file,
>> and a lot of errors will be reported. Especially, some yaml files such as
>> google,cros-ec-typec.yaml, extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml can not pass the
>> self-check, because of the examples. So temporarily allow additional
>> properties to keep the comprehensive dt_binding_check result clean.
> 
> My preference is to fix the binding to pass the checks and not just work around the issues. Working around the issues may mean the issues never get fixed.

I agree with your first sentenceļ¼šdon't just work around the issues. But these
errors are so annoying. Hope someone can add the description of the missing properties.
I'm not familiar with this module anyway.

And I don't fully agree with your last sentence. After all, the main properties are listed,
and the ones that are not listed should be minor ones.

> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ