[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49292e1a-7e46-b078-d15d-fb2f406317db@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:58:27 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 5.10 (includes lockless ringbuffer)
On 14/10/2020 16.16, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:50 PM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>> - Fully lockless ringbuffer implementation, including the support for
>> continuous lines. It will allow to store and read messages in any
>> situation wihtout the risk of deadlocks and without the need
>> of temporary per-CPU buffers.
>
> linux-m68k-atari_defconfig$ bloat-o-meter vmlinux.old
> vmlinux.lockless_ringbuffer
> add/remove: 39/16 grow/shrink: 9/15 up/down: 214075/-4362 (209713)
> Function old new delta
> _printk_rb_static_infos - 180224 +180224
> _printk_rb_static_descs - 24576 +24576
> [...]
>
> Seriously?!? Or am I being misled by the tools?
>
> linux-m68k-atari_defconfig$ size vmlinux.old vmlinux.lockless_ringbuffer
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 3559108 941716 177772 4678596 4763c4 vmlinux.old
> 3563922 1152496 175276 4891694 4aa42e vmlinux.lockless_ringbuffer
>
> Apparently not...
Hm, that's quite a lot. And the only reason the buffers don't live
entirely in .bss is because a few of their entries have non-zero
initializers.
Perhaps one could add a .init.text.initialize_static_data section of
function pointers, with the _DEFINE_PRINTKRB macro growing something like
static void __init __initialize_printkrb_##name(void) { \
_##name##_descs[_DESCS_COUNT(descbits) - 1] = ...; \
_##name##_infos[0] = ...; \
_##name##_infos[_DESCS_COUNT(descbits) - 1] = ...; \
} \
static_data_initializer(__initialize_printkrb_##name);
with static_data_initalizer being the obvious yoga for putting a
function pointer in the .init.text.initialize_static_data section. Then
very early in start_kernel(), probably first thing, iterate that section
and call all the functions. But maybe that's not even early enough?
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists