lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1b6f29c9-c9b1-fc1e-7f08-ec4da720accc@microchip.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:09:03 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com> CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: sam9x60: support only two programmable clocks On 14/10/2020 at 16:34, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > According to datasheet (Chapter 29.16.13, PMC Programmable Clock Register) > there are only two programmable clocks on SAM9X60. > > Fixes: 01e2113de9a5 ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 pmc driver") > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com> This is a fix: Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.2+ > --- > drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c > index ab6318c0589e..3c4c95603595 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c > @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static void __init sam9x60_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np) > parent_names[3] = "masterck"; > parent_names[4] = "pllack_divck"; > parent_names[5] = "upllck_divck"; > - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > char name[6]; > > snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "prog%d", i); > -- Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists