[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201014162036.GC712494@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:20:36 -0400
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Winischhofer <thomas@...ischhofer.net>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/12] usb: hosts: Remove in_interrupt() from comments
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
>
> The usage of in_interrupt() in drivers is phased out for various reasons.
>
> Various comments use !in_interrupt() to describe calling context for probe()
> and remove() functions. That's wrong because the calling context has to be
> preemptible task context, which is not what !in_interrupt() describes.
>
> Cleanup the comments. While at it add the missing kernel doc argument
> descriptors and make usb_hcd_msp_remove() static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pmcmsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pmcmsp.c
> @@ -233,7 +236,7 @@ int usb_hcd_msp_probe(const struct hc_dr
> * may be called without controller electrically present
> * may be called with controller, bus, and devices active
> */
> -void usb_hcd_msp_remove(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct platform_device *dev)
> +static void usb_hcd_msp_remove(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
Please don't intermix changes to comments with other more substantive
changes.
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-omap.c
> @@ -399,8 +401,7 @@ static int ohci_hcd_omap_probe(struct pl
>
> /**
> * ohci_hcd_omap_remove - shutdown processing for OMAP-based HCDs
> - * @dev: USB Host Controller being removed
> - * Context: !in_interrupt()
> + * @pdev: USB Host Controller being removed
> *
> * Reverses the effect of ohci_hcd_omap_probe(), first invoking
> * the HCD's stop() method. It is always called from a thread
You forgot to add the Context comment.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists