linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v21 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:52:08 +0200
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control


On 14/10/2020 20:07, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
>> +config ARCH_EPHEMERAL_STATES
>> +	def_bool n
>> +	help
>> +	  An arch should select this symbol if it does not keep an internal kernel
>> +	  state for kernel objects such as inodes, but instead relies on something
>> +	  else (e.g. the host kernel for an UML kernel).
>> +
> 
> This is used to disable Landlock for UML, correct?

Yes

> I wonder if it could be 
> more specific: "ephemeral states" is a very broad term.
> 
> How about something like ARCH_OWN_INODES ?

Sounds good. We may need add new ones (e.g. for network socket, UID,
etc.) in the future though.