linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] scripts: spelling: Remove space in the entry memry to memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201015224919.GA1129531@ArchLinux>
Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:19:19 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, colin.king@...onical.com,
        sfr@...b.auug.org.au, wangqing@...o.com, david@...hat.com,
        xndchn@...il.com, luca@...aceresoli.net, ebiggers@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scripts: spelling:  Remove space in the entry memry
 to memory

On 14:10 Thu 15 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 19:24 +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> On 06:38 Thu 15 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 18:53 +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> > > Fix the space in the middle in below entry.
>> > >
>> > > memry||memory
>> > []
>> > > diff --git a/scripts/spelling.txt b/scripts/spelling.txt
>> > []
>> > > @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ meetign||meeting
>> > >  memeory||memory
>> > >  memmber||member
>> > >  memoery||memory
>> > > -memry ||memory
>> > > +memry||memory
>> >
>> > No.  Don't post a bad patch, assume
>> > it's applied and then post a fix to
>> > the bad patch as v2.
>> >
>> > Send a single clean patch.
>> >
>>
>> Not sure what you mean...could you elaborate...don't know what is going on..>
>
>You sent a patch with a defect

Who doesn't???

>You sent a V2 patch that just corrects the defect in the first patch.

That's how it is working here for long time ...I am not sure about your
  involvement.

>Instead send a v3 patch without any defect.

No point ...I think your understanding takes a back seat...could you please
rebrush it??

..and you are telling me something which isn't practice here ..maybe some
other project with some other people you worked with...

certainly not here ...

Long story short, you found a flaw what I sent and I appreciate your review
and corrected the trivialities ...but rest what you are asking is garbage .

More ...I don't know why I am explaining this stuff to you...we have been here
doing this stuff for a long time ... (not sure about you)

Versioning is important for the person who maintain that file..because of lots
of reason ...and I am sure either you have forgotten or it skipped your mind
for the moment ..that is why I suggest ...please rebrush your understanding
...

Please don't unnecessarily streach thing ...we have other things to do ...do
not bringing "new rules" here for the sake of it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)