[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f231f9c29e44d154e1e8fcf2eed0a645@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:54:16 -0700
From: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@...eaurora.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64/mm: add fallback option to allocate virtually
contiguous memory
On 2020-10-13 04:38, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 10/13/2020 04:35 AM, Sudarshan Rajagopalan wrote:
>> When section mappings are enabled, we allocate vmemmap pages from
>> physically
>> continuous memory of size PMD_SIZE using vmemmap_alloc_block_buf().
>> Section
>> mappings are good to reduce TLB pressure. But when system is highly
>> fragmented
>> and memory blocks are being hot-added at runtime, its possible that
>> such
>> physically continuous memory allocations can fail. Rather than failing
>> the
>> memory hot-add procedure, add a fallback option to allocate vmemmap
>> pages from
>> discontinuous pages using vmemmap_populate_basepages().
>
> There is a checkpatch warning here, which could be fixed while merging
> ?
>
> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
> chars per line)
> #7:
> When section mappings are enabled, we allocate vmemmap pages from
> physically
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked
>
Thanks Anshuman for the review. I sent out an updated patch fixing the
checkpatch warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@...eaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>
> Nonetheless, this looks fine. Did not see any particular problem
> while creating an experimental vmemmap with interleaving section
> and base page mapping.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index 75df62fea1b6..44486fd0e883 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1121,8 +1121,11 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long
>> start, unsigned long end, int node,
>> void *p = NULL;
>>
>> p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PMD_SIZE, node, altmap);
>> - if (!p)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + if (!p) {
>> + if (vmemmap_populate_basepages(addr, next, node, altmap))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>>
>> pmd_set_huge(pmdp, __pa(p), __pgprot(PROT_SECT_NORMAL));
>> } else
>>
Sudarshan
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists