linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kunit-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201015163806.1c5696bb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:38:06 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 kunit-next tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:56:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   lib/kunit/test.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   45dcbb6f5ef7 ("kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format")
> 
> from the kunit-next tree and commit:
> 
>   e685acc91080 ("KUnit: KASAN Integration")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc lib/kunit/test.c
> index de07876b6601,dcc35fd30d95..000000000000
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@@ -15,11 -16,16 +16,6 @@@
>   #include "string-stream.h"
>   #include "try-catch-impl.h"
>   
> - static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
>  -static void kunit_print_tap_version(void)
> --{
> - 	WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false);
>  -	static bool kunit_has_printed_tap_version;
>  -
>  -	if (!kunit_has_printed_tap_version) {
>  -		pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
>  -		kunit_has_printed_tap_version = true;
>  -	}
> --}
> --
>   /*
>    * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
>    * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).

This is now a conflict between the kunit-next tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped