lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015095750.GA3935178@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:57:50 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <hegtvedt@...co.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.4/bluetooth 1/2] Bluetooth: Consolidate encryption
 handling in hci_encrypt_cfm

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>
> 
> This makes hci_encrypt_cfm calls hci_connect_cfm in case the connection
> state is BT_CONFIG so callers don't have to check the state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
> (cherry picked from commit 3ca44c16b0dcc764b641ee4ac226909f5c421aa3)

This is only in 5.8, what about all the other stable kernels?

> (cherry picked from commit 0a60996c7fa7010ea00d9b62fb6996d908a01ead)

Where is this commit from?  I don't see it in Linus's tree.

> ---
> AFAICT, fixing CVE 2020-10135 Bluetooth impersonation attacks have been
> left out for the 4.4 stable kernel. I cherry picked what I assume are
> the appropriate two patches missing from the 4.9 stable kernel. Please
> add them to upcoming 4.4 stable releases.

Why are you merging 2 commits together?  Please provide backports for
all stable kernels, if you want to see this in the 4.4.y tree.  We can
not have someone move from an older tree to a newer one and have a
regression.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ