linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:16:04 -0400
From:   Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     maz@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        jason@...edaemon.net, mark.rutland@....com,
        julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com, dianders@...omium.org,
        daniel.thompson@...aro.org, jason.wessel@...driver.com,
        ito-yuichi@...itsu.com, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as
 NMIs

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 04:42:08PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Add support to handle SGIs as regular NMIs. As SGIs or IPIs defaults to a
> special flow handler: handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_ipi(), so skip NMI
> handler update in case of SGIs.
> 
> Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs
> as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index 16fecc0..5efc865 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,11 @@ static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
>  	if (WARN_ON(gic_irq(d) >= 8192))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (get_intid_range(d) == SGI_RANGE) {
> +		gic_irq_set_prio(d, GICD_INT_NMI_PRI);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* desc lock should already be held */
>  	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
>  		u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
> @@ -514,6 +519,11 @@ static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d)
>  	if (WARN_ON(gic_irq(d) >= 8192))
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (get_intid_range(d) == SGI_RANGE) {
> +		gic_irq_set_prio(d, GICD_INT_DEF_PRI);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* desc lock should already be held */
>  	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
>  		u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
> @@ -1708,6 +1718,7 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
>  
>  	gic_dist_init();
>  	gic_cpu_init();
> +	gic_enable_nmi_support();
>  	gic_smp_init();
>  	gic_cpu_pm_init();
>  
> @@ -1719,8 +1730,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
>  			gicv2m_init(handle, gic_data.domain);
>  	}
>  
> -	gic_enable_nmi_support();
> -
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_free:
> -- 

Looks good to me. Please feel free to add:

        Reviewed-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>

Thanks!
Masa