linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 08/10] bridge: cfm: Netlink GET configuration Interface.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:24:13 +0000
From:   Henrik Bjoernlund <henrik.bjoernlund@...rochip.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <roopa@...dia.com>, <nikolay@...dia.com>,
        <jiri@...lanox.com>, <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 08/10] bridge: cfm: Netlink GET configuration
 Interface.

Thanks for your review. Comment below.
Regards
Henrik

The 10/14/2020 16:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:04:26 +0000 Henrik Bjoernlund wrote:
> > +             if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_SEQ_NO_UPDATE,
> > +                             mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.seq_no_update))
> > +                     goto nla_put_failure;
> > +
> > +             if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_PERIOD,
> > +                             mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.period))
> > +                     goto nla_put_failure;
> > +
> > +             if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_IF_TLV,
> > +                             mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.if_tlv))
> > +                     goto nla_put_failure;
> > +
> > +             if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_IF_TLV_VALUE,
> > +                            mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.if_tlv_value))
> > +                     goto nla_put_failure;
> > +
> > +             if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_PORT_TLV,
> > +                             mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.port_tlv))
> > +                     goto nla_put_failure;
> > +
> > +             if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_PORT_TLV_VALUE,
> > +                            mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.port_tlv_value))
> > +                     goto nla_put_failure;
> 
> Consider collapsing writing related attrs in a nest into a single
> if statement:
> 
>         if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_SEQ_NO_UPDATE,
>                         mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.seq_no_update) ||
>             nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_PERIOD,
>                         mep->cc_ccm_tx_info.period) ||
>                 ...
I will prefer to keep it as is for my personal taste :-)

-- 
/Henrik