linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANpmjNO9Gw0-U+QynFWPPZYEVgnZA84VHi_XrXfa5aiAq3kPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:15:03 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64

On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 15:39, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:12:37PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 11:40:52AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 19:58, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > If you need virt_to_page() to work, the address has to be part of the
> > > > > > > linear/direct map.
>
> > > > We're going with dynamically allocating the pool (for both x86 and
> > > > arm64),
>
> [...]
>
> > We've got most of this sorted now for v5 -- thank you!
> >
> > The only thing we're wondering now, is if there are any corner cases
> > with using memblock_alloc'd memory for the KFENCE pool? (We'd like to
> > avoid page alloc's MAX_ORDER limit.) We have a version that passes
> > tests on x86 and arm64, but checking just in case. :-)
>
> AFAICT otherwise the only noticeable difference might be PageSlab(), if
> that's clear for KFENCE allocated pages? A few helpers appear to check
> that to determine how something was allocated (e.g. in the scatterlist
> and hwpoison code), and I suspect that needs to behave the same.

We had to take care of setting PageSlab before, too. We do this during
kfence_init().

> Otherwise, I *think* using memblock_alloc should be fine on arm64; I'm
> not entirely sure for x86 (but suspect it's similar). On arm64:
>
> * All memory is given a struct page via memblocks_present() adding all
>   memory memblocks. This includes memory allocated by memblock_alloc().
>
> * All memory is mapped into the linear map via arm64's map_mem() adding
>   all (non-nomap) memory memblocks. This includes memory allocated by
>   memblock_alloc().

Very good, thank you. We'll send v5 with these changes rebased on
5.10-rc1 (in ~2 weeks).

Thanks,
-- Marco