[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015144241.GG24156@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:42:42 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kernel: add task_sigpending() helper
On 10/15, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> This is in preparation for maintaining signal_pending() as the decider
> of whether or not a schedule() loop should be broken, or continue
> sleeping. This is different than the core signal use cases, where we
> really want to know if an actual signal is pending or not.
> task_sigpending() returns non-zero if TIF_SIGPENDING is set.
>
> Only core kernel use cases should care about the distinction between
> the two, make sure those use the task_sigpending() helper.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
the same,
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists