[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201015144419.GH24156@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:44:19 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] kernel: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
On 10/15, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> This adds TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL handling in the generic code, which if set,
> will return true if signal_pending() is used in a wait loop. That causes
> an exit of the loop so that notify_signal tracehooks can be run. If the
> wait loop is currently inside a system call, the system call is restarted
> once task_work has been processed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
So I strongly disagree with CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY. Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists