linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mprotect: Call arch_validate_prot under mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:53:59 -0600
From:   Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mprotect: Call arch_validate_prot under mmap_lock
 and with length

On 10/15/20 3:05 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 03:21:16PM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
>> What FreeBSD does seems like a reasonable thing to do. Any way first
>> thing to do is to update sparc to use arch_validate_flags() and update
>> sparc_validate_prot() to not peek into vma without lock.
> 
> If you go for arch_validate_flags(), I think sparc_validate_prot()
> doesn't need the vma at all.

Yes, the plan is to move vma flag check from sparc_validate_prot() to
arch_validate_flags()..

> 
> BTW, on the ADI topic, I think you have a race in do_swap_page() since
> set_pte_at() is called before arch_do_swap_page(). So a thread in the
> same process would see the new mapping but the tags have not been
> updated yet. Unless sparc relies on the new user pte to be set, I think
> you can just swap the two calls.
> 

Thanks for pointing that out. I will take a look at it.

--
Khalid